Table 6 The indicators about developer
From: Evaluation indicators for open-source software: a review
Paper | # Quantification | Indicator Affect Developer | Correlation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Â | Add new features | Â | Â |
Raymond (1999) | Fix bugs | N.A. | N.A. |
| Â | Release new versions | Â | Â |
| Â | Â | Social values | Â |
Markus et al. (2000) | N.A. | (Altruism, reputation, | Positive |
| Â | Â | and ideology) | Â |
Crowston et al. (2003) | Developer type | N.A. | N.A. |
| Â | Developer satisfaction | Â | Â |
| Â | Developers | Â | Â |
Crowston et al. (2004) | Bug fixing time | N.A. | N.A. |
| Â | Project activity | Â | Â |
Fershtman et al. (2004) | Output of each developer | License | Negative |
| Â | - | License | Negative |
Subramaniam (2009) | Developer interest | Target audience | Unsureness |
| Â | Activity level | User interest | Positive |
Garousi (2009) | Developers | N.A. | N.A. |
| Â | Bug-fixing performance | Â | Â |
Midha et al. (2012) | Developers (CVS log files) | N.A. | N.A. |
| Â | - | Project centrality | Positive |
Wu et al. (2007) | Project activity | Project density | Negative |
| Â | Popularity | Financial support | Positive |
Colazo (2005) | Developers | N.A. | N.A. |
| Â | and its contribution | Â | Â |
| Â | Follower | - | - |
Tsay et al. (2012) | Projects owned | Task focus | Positive |
| Â | Projects contributed | Work concentration | Positive |
| Â | Developers | Â | Â |
Colazo et al. (2009) | Activity level | Copyleft | Positive |
| Â | Developer permanence | Â | Â |
| Â | Development speed | Â | Â |
| Â | Project activity | Â | Â |
Lerner (2005) | Developers | N.A. | N.A. |
| Â | Bugs or errors | Â | Â |
Senyard and Michlmayr (2004) | N.A. | Leadership | Positive |
| Â | Â | Communication effectiveness | Positive |
Hata et al. (2015) | N.A. | Documents | Positive |
| Â | Â | Social values | Positive |
| Â | Â | Popularity | Positive |
Fronchetti et al. (2019) | N.A. | Documents | Positive |
| Â | Â | Project age | Positive |
| Â | Â | Program languages | Positive |