Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison among lattice-based dynamic signature schemes

From: A fully dynamic forward-secure group signature from lattice

Schemes

Gpk

Usk

GS

Forward Secure

Dynamic

Libert et al. (2016)

\(\tilde{\mathcal {O}}(\lambda ^{2}\cdot L)\)

\(\tilde{\mathcal {O}}(\lambda )\)

\(\tilde{\mathcal {O}}(\lambda \cdot L)\)

No

Partially Dynamic

Ling et al. (2018)

\(\tilde{\mathcal {O}}(\lambda ^{2}\cdot L)\)

\(\tilde{\mathcal {O}}(\lambda \cdot L)\)

\(\tilde{\mathcal {O}}(\lambda \cdot L)\)

No

Partially Dynamic

Ling et al. (2019)

\(\tilde{\mathcal {O}}(\lambda ^{2}+\lambda \cdot L)\)

\(\tilde{\mathcal {O}}(\lambda + L)\)

\(\tilde{\mathcal {O}}(\lambda \cdot L)\)

No

Fully Dynamic

Kansal et al. (2020)

\(\tilde{\mathcal {O}}(\lambda ^{2}\cdot L)\)

\(\tilde{\mathcal {O}}(\lambda )\)

\(\tilde{\mathcal {O}}(\lambda ^{3}\cdot L)\)

Yes

Fully Dynamic

Ours

\(\tilde{\mathcal {O}}(\lambda ^{2}\cdot d+\lambda \cdot L)\)

\(\tilde{\mathcal {O}}(\lambda \cdot d^{3})\)

\(\tilde{\mathcal {O}}(\lambda ^{2}\cdot (L+d))\)

Yes

Fully Dynamic