Skip to main content

Table 5 The lowest MSE for the existing method and the enhancements which were tested on MS-FIMU dataset

From: Sarve: synthetic data and local differential privacy for private frequency estimation

Method

ε = ln(2)

ε = ln(3)

ε = ln(4)

ε = ln(5)

ε = ln(6)

ε = ln(7)

RS + FD[ADP]

0.000108

5.59E−05

4.64E−05

4.40E−05

3.37E−05

2.97E−05

RAPPOR

0.000207

8.86E−05

8.01E−05

5.29E−05

5.78E−05

4.75E−05

Hadamard response

0.004249

0.001295

0.000635

0.00037

0.000263

0.000187

Sarve

0.000105

6.73E−05

4.78E−05

4.41E−05

3.20E−05

2.72E−05

Method

ε = 2

ε = 3

ε = 4

ε = 5

ε = 6

ε = 7

RS + FD[ADP]

2.02E−05

1.12E−05

5.87E−06

3.90E−06

4.35E−06

3.10E−06

RAPPOR

4.87E−05

2.28E−05

1.23E−05

8.58E−06

5.73E−06

4.91E−06

Hadamard response

0.000164

3.79E−05

1.88E−05

1.13E−05

1.72E−05

1.78E−05

Sarve

2.50E−05

9.78E−06

6.81E−06

4.64E−06

4.66E−06

3.21E−06

  1. The values in bold indicate privacy conditions when Sarve performed better than adaptive RS+FD and resulted in lower MSE between real and post-privatization estimated frequencies