Skip to main content

Table 6 The lowest MSE for the existing method and the enhancements which were tested on a synthetic 10-dimensional dataset having 50,000 records

From: Sarve: synthetic data and local differential privacy for private frequency estimation

Method

ε = ln(2)

ε = ln(3)

ε = ln(4)

ε = ln(5)

ε = ln(6)

ε = ln(7)

RS + FD[ADP]

0.000496

0.000255

0.000198

0.00015

0.000114

0.000111

RAPPOR

0.000807

0.00048

0.000325

0.00026

0.000247

0.000226

Hadamard response

0.000943

0.000312

0.000268

0.000215

0.000187

0.000151

Sarve

0.000481

0.000261

0.000207

0.000145

0.000118

0.000106

Method

ε = 2

ε = 3

ε = 4

ε = 5

ε = 6

ε = 7

RS + FD[ADP]

9.65E−05

4.51E−05

3.38E−05

2.45E−05

2.43E−05

2.35E−05

RAPPOR

0.000205

0.000112

6.63E−05

4.86E−05

3.06E−05

2.43E−05

Hadamard response

0.000177

0.000111

0.000126

0.000118

0.000102

9.77E−05

Sarve

0.000101

4.39E−05

3.14E−05

2.68E−05

2.41E−05

2.26E−05

  1. The values in bold indicate privacy conditions when Sarve performed better than adaptive RS+FD and resulted in lower MSE between real and post-privatization estimated frequencies