Skip to main content

Table 13 The accuracy result with and without imbalance learning (%)

From: Exploring best-matched embedding model and classifier for charging-pile fault diagnosis

Classifiers*

GloVe

Word2vec

BERT

RF

0

79.67

81.26

80.32

1

78.96

80.44

80.26

SVM

0

27.58

31.23

30.47

1

37.65

29.64

31.05

KNN

0

42.02

43.25

42.72

1

42.02

42.07

41.78

MLP

0

45.43

33.88

41.31

1

42.96

36.12

39.54

RNN

0

82.91

78.26

81.85

1

81.91

80.02

81.38

AB

0

23.75

24.04

22.27

1

24.75

26.69

27.28

GBDT

0

42.31

41.37

43.84

1

41.37

40.42

43.08

DT

0

78.90

77.90

78.43

1

76.72

77.67

76.90

ET

0

76.72

76.72

77.14

1

77.14

76.78

76.84

VOTE

0

52.80

51.74

56.28

1

54.10

51.97

57.22

  1. *1 = imbalance learning, 0 = non-imbalance learning