Skip to main content

Table 2 Performance comparison in different models and graph generation methods

From: Aparecium: understanding and detecting scam behaviors on Ethereum via biased random walk

  

Random time period based

Random address based

Policy-based selective addresses

Li’s (Li et al. 2021)

Chen’s (Chen et al. 2020a)

Chen’s (Chen et al. 2021)

Wu’s (Wu et al. 2020)

Ours

Deepwalk

Precision

0.318

0.595

0.782

0.799

0.911

Recall

0.518

0.158

0.727

0.762

0.729

F1-score

0.394

0.250

0.753

0.780

0.810

Node2vec

Precision

0.364

0.648

0.827

0.870

0.864

Recall

0.543

0.157

0.749

0.822

0.842

F1-score

0.436

0.253

0.786

0.845

0.853

GCN

Precision

0.417

0.628

0.881

0.932

0.984

Recall

0.580

0.174

0.719

0.720

0.848

F1-score

0.485

0.272

0.792

0.813

0.911

GraphSage

Precision

0.387

0.610

0.854

0.970

0.949

Recall

0.569

0.154

0.703

0.746

0.851

F1-score

0.461

0.246

0.771

0.844

0.897

  1. Bold values indicate the highest performance method